Just to be clear, your assertion was that NO EMPLOYEE contributes more than $1.5m/year to the company.

> no employee contributes the average per-employee output to the company

> Sub in $1.5m/year

Are you standing by that or is your new assertion now that no employee contributes $500m but that many do contribute $1.5m/year?

The back and forth is getting a bit confusing so trying to make sure we're on the same page.

edit: You do realize that a non-trivial number of employees including ICs are paid more than $1.5m/year. So even Google disagree with your assertion.