This is probably the first pitch for using AI as leverage that's actually connected with me. I don't want to write my own movie (sounds fucking miserable), but I do want to watch yours!
It is terrifyingly good at writing. I expected Freshmen college level but it's actually close to professional in terms of prose.
The plan is maybe transition into children's books then children shows made with AI catered to a particular child at a particular phase of development (Bluey talks to your kid about making sure to pick up their toys)
Maybe today only a few people can do this, but five years from now? Ten? What sucker would pay for any TV shows or books or video games or anything if there's a comfy UI workflow or whatever I can download for free to make my own?
I think it's about time the industry faced that risk. They have it coming in spades.
For example, LOST wouldn't have been such a galactic waste of time if I could have asked an AI to rewrite the last half of the series. Current-generation AI is almost sufficient to do a better job than the actual writers, as far as the screenplay itself is concerned, and eventually the technology will be able to render what it writes.
Call it... severance.
The bottleneck is no longer on labor to turn ideas into reality, the bottleneck is imagination itself. It's incredible. The cost to produce/consume going down along with many other facets of the economy translates into deflation.
If you make less money, or work less hours, or only have a single person in your family work - that's ok because money will go further. That's the whole idea behind Star Trek, the first step though was intelligent computers, automation and robots. Harnessed in a way that doesn't backfire on us.
It's the human competition. Every human in the world is competing - on some level - with every other human.
Your described widespread "benefits" to society just change the playing field all humans are competing on. The money will go from that to something else - to pick something topical say, housing.
Precisely. Being able to more easily produce and consume just means more production and consumption. The "rat race" competition will continue. No one will work less.
You don't understand what that means. That means your soul's worth is measured with more precision and accuracy. That conjoined to free market economy implicates that individuals and groups of people producing less can be more openly considered to be objectively less human.
I don't personally care, but that's not... It seem to me that vast majority of people around here already don't exactly like what the Internet had always rewarded, nor how fast it's evolving, nor where it's headed. I think that accelerating that only accelerates that, and I suspect it might not exactly be what you would reflect on positively later.
Even if AI prose weren’t shockingly dull, these models all go completely insane long before they reach novel length. Anthropic are doing a good job embarrassing themselves at an easy bug-catching game for barely-literate 8-year olds as we speak, and the model’s grip on reality is basically gone at this point, even with a second LLM trying to keep it on track. And even before they get to the ‘insanity’ stage, their writing inevitably experiences regression towards the average of all writing styles regardless of the prompt, so there’s not much ‘prompt engineering’ you can do to fix this.