'Eggflation' sending US shoppers to Mexico – where $300 fines await
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Virulent Newcastle disease, specifically, is a major concern. It is endemic in Mexico and eggs are a vector of transmission.
That said, threatening to allow imports from Mexico might be a good way to break the US egg cartel which is almost entirely to blame for the high egg prices.
I'm not sure where you're going with this, though I will say that it is also a major threat to the chicken meat industry.
If you're concerned about the chickens, you should support small and independent farm subsidies and eschew factory farms that don't even have to do anything wrong to be dangerous.
(I get my eggs from an organic farm just outside the city where I live, btw.)
The person you replied to said, "I think GP is saying, the point is that the biosecurity controls are to protect local agriculture in the sense of ensuring availability. If there's no availability due to cartel practices anyway then spending effort enforcing biosecurity controls is pointless."
I generally agree with this. People don't import eggs when they have access to affordable eggs, implying that importers of unlikely diseased eggs or no are not likely to be proximal to farms. (And more importantly, why take imported eggs to a farm? Are producers importing? Doubtful.)
So, how'd we get here?
The recent consolidation and prevalence of factory farms, in addition to introducing food supply fragility by forcing smaller producers to exit the market, has created the most adversarial conditions for hens. Shrinking factory farms and bolstering more and smaller producers will reduce the incidence of outbreaks and limit the amount of culling needed.
I'm also contending that humans also suffer because of this, and while it's noble to consider the chickens, doing so in our current state does not decrease either their vulnerability or the harm to vulnerable human populations. When you play with food prices and availability, there are real effects to development and educational performance in children that are not quick or simple to quantify. I think both deserve to be healthy.
If people see the message "X is expected to rise in price!" enough they're more likely to bear the increase instead of curtailing purchases.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/business/egg-prices-are-final...
Indeed but the next sentence in the same title is
> But they’re about to spike again
It also doesn't take into account that there was just announced a large import deal done with Turkey and South Korea and other countries.
"We are talking in the hundreds of millions of eggs for the short term"
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us
Historically, there's occasionally a minor spike around Easter, yet its usually mild compared to the massive increase lately. Usually around Mar 20th-30 timeframe. Prices are, currently, back close to where the trend line has been heading for the last couple years. Most of 23-24 egg prices were floating around $2.
Notably, the last several years have shown signs of similar trend, just not quite as drastic. 22-23 both showed mild jumps around Christmas-post-Christmas timeframe.
Last week they were 12.99 for a dozen. This week they are 14.99 for a dozen. The news says they are going down, but what the news says matters little when the reality dramatically differs.
You can't trust mainstream news anymore. They lie for the benefit of the monopolist.
I can't imagine eggs are dense enough or resistant to spoilage enough to try and smuggle through a border crossing but maybe they know something we don't.
But going across the border to shop is very common in general.
Would you recommend they should eat (Little Debbie snack) cake, instead?