For those who read only the headline or article:

> In this paper, we aim to address this gap by conducting a survey of a professionally diverse set of knowledge workers ( = 319), eliciting detailed real-world examples of tasks (936) for which they use GenAI, and directly measuring their perceptions of critical thinking during these tasks

So, they asked people to remember times they used AI, and then asked them about their own perceptions about their critical thinking when they did.

How are we even pretending there is serious scientific discussion to be had about these "results"?