Targeting of Tufts Student for Deportation Stuns Friends and Teachers
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Not pro Hamas. Not pro 7 October. It’s barely even about the war in Gaza—more a procedural argument about the role of the student senate in college affairs.
She deserves to be set free and to be able to collect damages. The officers who arrested her, meanwhile, should be investigated by Massachusetts—I doubt they had a warrant.
Most immigrated on student visas. Harassing immigrant students in universities will lead to the US no longer being a seen as a great destination for the brightest minds.
But forget being a leading economy, this type of attack on students — for the crime of writing an essay in a student newspaper — is morally outrageous as well. It is unamerican.
"Hundreds of international students wake up to an email asking them to self deport for campus activism"
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/hundreds-of-int...
No, it’s not. Like, this article is Exhibit A for not labelling everything we don’t like terrorism.
Terrifying. Fascist. Sure. Not terrorism. Unless we’re diluting the term terrorism to the point of meaninglessness.
Does this apply to the current case? It seems to check every box. The actions were unlawful, since the student — even immigrant students on visas — have 1st amendment rights. Was it intimidation? It certainly was. Was it against civilians? Yes. In pursuit of political aims? Yes.
The Gestapo weren’t terrorists, for example, again, unless even police brutality is terrorism at which point we have to conclude that every system has elements of terrorism in it, which again, dilutes the term to meaninglessness.
Disagree that it's only terrorism if perpetuated by non-state actors. State-sponsored terrorism occurs when a government actively supports or engages in terrorist violence, either directly or through non-state actors, to achieve its political goals. (This definition is from Google as well, from its AI overview).
The Wikipedia section on the definition is probably a smarter place to start than an AI summary.
I believe the real purpose of the current administration is to establish a precedent of suppressing dissent at universities. Their method is twofold: (1) Ambush and spirit away students to intimidate the student community and establish an atmosphere of fear, and (2) make it clear to university administrations that their research funding — to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars — will be taken away if they don't suppress dissent.
They are not just doing this to universities. They are doing this to members of congress (threat of primarying by Trump and Musk), judges (threat of impeachment), law firms (threat of canceling federal contracts and security clearances), etc. This atmosphere of fear and intimidation — of pretty much everyone — will be needed when Trump refuses to give up power at the end of his second term.
Yes, I agree that this is state terrorism. I also agree with the article’s criticism section, inasmuch as I think there is a useful delineation between illegal arrests and e.g. the government planting bombs among its opposition [1].