> The NSF itself said that sexual harassment
> is a problem at the base.
I'm not claiming otherwise, I was commenting on how bizarre it is to work this into an article about a transport bus in Antarctica. > They surveyed women there and 59 percent
> said they had been harassed.
I don't think they did. Did you read the report?The survey[1] had a 24% response rate, so that 59% number is extrapolated from that, it's actually just over 14%.
The report certainly contains some deeply troubling anecdotes, but (no surprise) there's a wide chasm between what it claims, and how it's been reported on.
But don't take my word for it, read what they have to say on page 28:
"[...]it is important to note that the survey
and focus group questions were not
designed to elicit information regarding
the prevalence or incidence of sexual
assault within USAP. This remains an effort
for the future. Instead, the qualitative
and quantitative data elicited extensive
information regarding individuals’
experiences and perceptions. Team LDSS
did not independently investigate or
otherwise seek to verify the accuracy
of individuals’ reporting."
That 59% claim comes from a footnote on page 33 of the report. 33%/47% of men/women said "sexual assault" was a problem in the USAP, and 48%/72% of men/women said the same of "sexual assault".The 59% is then women respondents who had a "negative experience" with either assault or harassment.
I don't believe that means, as you claim, that "they had been harassed". Earlier on page 30 they say:
Approximately 40% of all focus group
participants discussed a personal
negative experience with sexual assault
or sexual harassment
Neither of those percentages in footnotes appear to be supported by accompanying source data. But since they go out of their way to distinguish between a "negative experience" and "personal negative experience", the 59% appears to refer to some broader category than personal experience with harassment or assault.1. https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/documents/USAP%20SAHPR%20Report....