https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/nov/02/whyiha...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/10/french-writer-...
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-The-Guardian-so-increasingly-mi...
The people whose villages were pillaged by the Red Army, who raped all women there and stole everything of value will likely hate Russians.
Women who experience a lot of violence from men, even second hand, will likely hate men. It’s normal, hate is a natural response to harm.
Doesn’t mean all Russians are bad, or all men. I don’t feel personally attacked.
You can make up all sorts of excuses for racism and sexism and all the other -isms. They don't make it right.
TL;DR: The Guardian is misandrist.
The problematic racism is when people hate <race> despite <race> never harming them in any way, usually because that helps them justify systemically disadvantaging <race>.
You don't make the distinction, and draw equivalence between the two, so for you it's equally bad, I understand that.
I didn't spend much time on it. Let them stew in their manhate.