My favorite part about this (and all GenAI) comments section is where one person says, "This is my personal experience using AI" and then a chorus of people chime in "Well, you're using it wrong!"
For example, some companies are using AI to create tickets or to collate feedback from users.
I can clearly see that this is making them think far less through the problem and a lot of this sixth sense understanding of the problem space happens through working through these ticket creation or product creation documents which are now being done by AI.
That is causing the quality of the work to become this weird drone like NPC like state where they aren't really solving real issues yet they're getting a lot of stuff done.
It's still very early so I do not know how best to talk to them about it. But it's very clear that any sort of creative work, problem solving, etc has huge negative implications when AI is used even a little bit.
I have also started to think that a great angel investment question is to ask companies if they are a non AI zone and investing in them will bring better returns in the future.
It tends to be the same with anything hyped / divisive. Human tend to exaggerate in both direction in communication, especially in low-stake environment such as an internet forum, or when they stand to gain something from the hype.
Obviously their views are based on the sum of all their experience with LLMs. We don't have to say so every time.