> Seriously, AGI to the HN crowd is not the same as AGI to the average human. To my parents, these bots must look like fucking magic.

So does a drone show to an uncontacted tribe. So does a card trick to a chimpanzee (there are videos of them freaking out when a card disappears).

That's not an argument for or against anything.

I propose this:

"AGI is a self-optimizing artificial organism that can solve 99% of all the humanity's problems."

See, it's not a bad definition IMO. Find me one NS-5 from the "I, Robot" movie that also has access to all science and all internet and all history and can network with the others and fix our cities, nature, manufacturing, social issues and a few others, just in a decade or two. Then we have AGI.

Comparing to what was there 10 years ago and patting ourselves on the back about how far we have gotten is being complacent.

Let's never be complacent.