The mere fact that there is a settlement says something to me.
"My commitment:
- We will never seek victory in a just case against us, even if we will probably win.
- We will never surrender/settle an unjust case against us, even if we will probably lose."[1]
That or he is a hypocritical self-aggrandizing liar when he claims the Fremont factory is not abhorrently and pervasively racist.
But did he instruct them before to seek victory? If he did, then your set of tautologies just contradicted themselves...
Given that they clearly settled we must either believe they are acting consistently and thus believe the case to be just. Or they both settled and fought (or believe the case to be unjust) which means they are acting inconsistently and are thus hypocrites.
That concludes my lesson in elementary logic.
I guess after this lesson of logic I need to take a lesson in proper reading, and you perhaps need one for writing.