The rule of law does not prohibit bad arrests nor can it. The rule of law provides the opportunity for remedy after the fact.
The rule of law does not prohibit bad arrests nor can it. The rule of law provides the opportunity for remedy after the fact.
Absolutely yes. This needs to stop right here, and the consequences for violating the rule of law, for violating due process, for violating human rights, must be real.
There is no hypothetical here.
The "Cash for Children" judges got summons for Christ's sake.
Pam Bondi mere hours ago stated they would go after more judges like this. This isn't normal or right.
You're clearly not interested in good-faith discussion, good bye.
> The rule of law does not prohibit bad arrests nor can it. The rule of law provides the opportunity for remedy after the fact.
In a world where you and I could be renditioned to a foreign country and thrown into slave labor by the government simply acting fast enough as to maneuver around the court then there is no rule of law and there is no remedy.
I think a better remedy is to work within the laws of the country and to elect different federal representatives (president, senator, house representatives).
Secession would definitely be worse for any state attempting it.