I don't get how this is useful, just because it might not be inevitable doesn't stop it being a reality now.
Also, house size? What a weird metric.
Also, house size? What a weird metric.
If it turned out that wealth inequality was unavoidable, it would change the nature of the solutions worth exploring.
Rich people who benefit from everyone else thinking this is the natural way of things and thus they are not to blame. The same kind of people who call workers arrogant and say they should be thankful to employers and be put in their place through unemployment.
https://tribunemag.co.uk/2023/09/the-viral-ceo-shows-the-tru...
Monetarily I'm at the poor end of wealth, but I am content and want for little. This is also why I probably don't get the house size metric used here. My current, humble, abode is big enough for my needs. Given more money I don't see me upgrading.
What solutions will be worth exploring to solve current inequalities if we know it's not inevitable, given our current situation?