Hacker News Reader

Comment by blincoln | Hacker News Reader

I'm guessing you've never lived in a rural area?

* Protection against aggressive wild animals.

* Protection against aggresive humans. This often applies elsewhere, but becomes less and less optional the further away law enforcement is.

* Arguably more humane way of killing pests than poison or most types of lethal trap.

View on HN

I lived mostly in rural areas but this still sounds too wild. Are US rural areas so dangerous? Especially aggressive humans? I've newer felt that I need the gun to protect myself, but than again I do not live in a place where 'aggressive humans' could easily[0] have a gun.

[0] As it is harder to obtain gun on illegal market when it is harder to obtain one on legal market.

Most of the time I don't need a puncture repair kit / spare inner tube when cycling, but when I have a puncture I really need it.

You don't feel the need for something like a gun for self defence. However if/when you do need to defend yourself then your opinion will quickly change.

Except it's the other way around? Some people here claim that they do feel the need for a gun. However, if that's true, then it's surprising that in most counties with stricter gun (i.e. most counties) laws don't agree.

No it isn't the other way around. Some young men (in the UK) in high crime areas will carry them illegally because it makes them feel safer. UK has strict gun and knife laws.

https://www.mylondon.news/news/zone-1-news/london-knife-crim...

https://www.barnardos.org.uk/blog/what-young-people-say-abou...

https://theconversation.com/why-so-many-young-british-men-ar...

I mean yeah these are legitimate uses, but how often is this stuff happening?

As compared to cars - which is pretty much the last line of defense against you being homeless and without a job.

I would wager most people can give up their guns, say, 50% of the time and nothing changes. The same isn't true for cars.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com