Are you struck at the possibility of a inner-city family on welfare, or poor rural areas thinking that the US should be spending fungible dollars on them and not someone half way across the world?
It seems like they actually plan on cutting it, so I don't think your argument has any weight.
We will probably never be in agreement with government having more money to inefficiently distribute vs keeping it in the pockets of the earners. Sorry.
Politicians which are drastically cutting foreign aid usually doesn't increase it locally because they do not agree with the whole concept.
We will probably never be in agreement with government having more money to inefficiently distribute vs keeping it in the pockets of the earners. Sorry.