so when the cats lays in front of it -- it will just run over it, not being able to see it?
> If it can be proven to be poor engineering
Usually after 10 years of deep investigation, given the parties have enough monetary resources to keep the momentum on the law wheel. Read the case I sent about the guy wrongly jailed. Had they not discovered, eventually that it was a car malfunction, he would have still been in jail.
> Yet you're incapable of throwing yourself under a normal car? Doesn't this contradict your previous point about sabotage?
I guess what I was trying to say is that I think getting killed by a car driven by machine feels easier on your conscious than being killed by a car who is driven by a human. I cant explain why.