Hacker News Reader

You proved my point actually.

Neither of those things is actually useful as an eater of food?

You want less fresh food and from sketchier sources yet you think those are virtues?

They are useful to people who buy food (who hasn't had some potatoes sprout in a cabinet?), and to society generally. Insects are a fact of fruit, to call that "sketchy" is just ignorant.

Sprouted potatoes is a sing its time to get some new ones... you want to eat horded 6 month old potatoes glhf

I don't eat fumigated strawberries so replacing fumigated strawberries with irradiated strawberries is... not useful?

This is a case where the science evolved to justify a pre-decided narrative. This was absolutely necessary for an unsustainable food industry in an overly financialised nation(guess which). Don't waste your breath arguing logically. Just try your level best to ensure it doesn't occur in your local food economy, for the near future. Eventually, the GMO folks will reap.

If the potatoes last longer without going bad, then there's no reason to replace them prematurely. You have a predicted narrative that any preservation method you aren't comfortable is intrinsically bad because it lowers food quality, but I can guarantee you there are countless other forms of food preservation you have no problem with.

It comes down to superstition.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com