(Also, if you are willing to be pointlessly formal, it goes in both directions, since it can be argued that a computer, which belongs to a person, who in the future will become DOGE's software engineer, but hasn't become yet, also formally isn't a "DOGE software engineer’s computer".)
As long as it's a work computer, what does it matter if it's his current computer or not? Remember that we're talking about an infostealer, it got his credentials and "that's it" (that's gravely serious).
This might just be selection bias because there is a large crowd of angry people looking for things to fling at DOGE.
If his accounts were compromised after the computer was (as article indicates), people would still care. It included Greenfield too, so potentially has password reuse risk.