Appreciate the comment, I understand what you're trying to say.

Just to clear something up where I'm at: I'm a student, not a professional researcher (yet, anyway), and I'm trying to get into this realm step by step. I don't actually have much of a network or people around me to help share my work, so publishing it myself is kind of the only way I can get feedback from others who are into this sort of thing.

Also, I realize grades and university matter, but I think that trying to do it — even if it's not perfect — has to count for something as well. Publishing this is a way of learning, improving, and maybe getting closer to being part of a real research team someday.

You're correct as far as the abstract on ResearchGate is concerned — I didn't realize it got scrambled when I copied it over from the LaTeX version. Thank you for pointing it out to me, I'll fix it.

And sure, I know it sounds weird that I'm the only author. I understand why you'd question it. But I'm not claiming this is the evidence of anything — I'm just presenting a thing I've been messing around with and hoping that people can help say where there might be something to it, or where it doesn't work. That's the entire premise.

And AI — and this was not accomplished by AI. It's just me. Sure, I did use LaTeX and a PDF editor, but the writing and the thinking are mine.

Thanks again for reading. If you have any ideas on the actual content, I'd really love to hear them.