Minor criticism, you can't claim this as a problem "Unfair distribution - Fast workers might grab all the work" and then turn around and claim it as a benefit in your own solution "Natural load balancing - Fast consumers get more work".
Fair point. Can you think of a better way to weave that into what I’m trying to illustrate as a mental model? I struggled with that. Happy to read a PR that tries to capture it better.
it's fine. grabbing "all" the work is not the same as getting "more" work.