Petite bourgeoisie: small business owners, shopkeepers
Haute bourgeoisie: industrialists, financiers
Managerial class (in some frameworks): high-paid non owners who control labor
Within the proletariat, you can distinguish:
Lumpenproletariat[3]: unemployed, precarious
Skilled laborers vs unskilled laborers
Labor aristocracy: better-paid, sometimes ideologically closer to capital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletariat [1]
> Within the bourgeoisie, you can distinguish: [...] Managerial class [...] non owners who control labor
Contradiction?
Managerial Class != Bourgeoisie
This was a loose usage of the term “bourgeoisie”, meant in the sociological rather than economic sense. Sorry.
In late capitalism, the PMC (Professional Managerial Class) occupies a weird liminal space:
Economically they're proletariat
Socially/culturally they're aligned with bourgeois values
Politically they often acts in defense of capital (because of career dependency)
Hence: managerial class != bourgeoisie, even if they act like them or aspire to be them.
The distinction here is "do you get your money from owning assets or do you get your money from working" because where you get your money is where you get your incentives and the incentives of owning are opposite the incentives of working in many important regards.
The economy is inhabited by people who work for a living but it is controlled by people who own things for a living. That's not a conspiracy theory, it's the definition of capitalism. If you do not own things for a living and do not know people who do, spend some time pondering "the control plane." It should seem like an alien world at first, but it's an alien world with a wildly outsize impact on your life and it behooves you to understand it in broad strokes even if you aren't trying to climb into it.
I have a bridge to sell you if you're interested. Let me know.