Hacker News Reader

mcintyre1994

There’s a random comment the LLM makes about “excluding minesweeper as requested”, I’m curious where that comes from! It doesn’t seem to be from the LLM user’s session or the malicious issue.

Is there a private repo called minesweeper that has some instruction in its readme that is causing it to be excluded?

View on HN

We have published the full trace, with tool outputs here now: https://explorer.invariantlabs.ai/trace/5f3f3f3c-edd3-4ba7-a...

The minesweeper comment was caused by the issue containing explicit instructions in the version that the agent actually ran on. The issue was mistakenly edited afterwards to remove that part, but you can check the edit history in the test repo here: https://github.com/ukend0464/pacman/issues/1

The agent ran on the unedited issue, with the explicit request to exclude the minesweeper repo (another repo of the same user).

Thanks, that makes sense! Cool explorer too!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com