Those are not the comments I'm talking about. There are some in this thread that are derisive due to its focus on qualitative theory and predictions instead of a mathematical foundation.
I can't quite see why complaints about the lack of quantitative support are unreasonable. They sound reasonable to me. In fact there seems to be a very broad consensus that the article lacks supporting numbers.
Apart from reasonable disagreement, there's a lot of downvotes and flagged posts here.
I agree that reasonable dissenting posts have been flagged here. If that's what you're saying?
Both sides. I expressed some modest support in 2 short posts, and got downvoted twice.