Today, the web is creatively barren relative to the wild innovation of the time. Actual creatives have been cut out of the process, requiring the intervention of people like you and I. HTML5 was supposed to replace Flash, and a generation later, we still don’t have anything close to its expressive power. React takes twice the effort for a quarter of the experience.
I’m still bitter at Steve Jobs and his flying monkeys at Wired. Apple could have worked with Adobe to fix Flash. Adobe was willing. But let’s be honest: the App Store was shaping up to be a cash cow, and Flash was a direct, free competitor. Apple had no interest in letting it survive. So now we’re left with a dismal, sanitized web.
Are you referring to the tooling around HTML5 + Canvas elements or the technical possibilities?
> "New open standards created in the mobile era, such as HTML5, will win on mobile devices (and PCs too)."
> "HTML5, the new web standard that has been adopted by Apple, Google and many others, lets web developers create advanced graphics, typography, animations and transitions without relying on a third party browser plug-in (like Flash)."
> "Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any kind of web content."
> "If developers need to rewrite their Flash websites, why not use modern technologies like HTML5, CSS and JavaScript?"
> "HTML5 is completely open and controlled by a standards committee, of which Apple is a member."
I view these as cynical. HTML5 has yet to match the experience that Flash delivered, and I believe Jobs knew that it could not even at the time he said it.
The designer experience with Flash tooling, the end user experience sans plugins or the technical capabilities of HTML5 + Canvas?
> App Store was shaping up to be a cash cow
Okay, how many apps have some super mind-blowing animations on their home screen? Maybe nobody really wanted that? (And, certainly Jobs did not want companies writing CRUD apps in Flash/AS3.)
There was also more of the run of the mill 'hero animation', jquery was good enough for that. I think they still use Adobe Animate for banner ads.
And then there was the junior guy who was good at flash and just wanted the entire web to be flash, and that was more of the debate because some assistant creative director thought it was slick.
(And lest I forget, there were also the ActionScript guys who spent all day in their IDE writing MVC code, and rarely using the Flash editor.)
But on HN, I commonly see the opposite "retro manchild" take that Flash was all just all web fun & games applets, totally unlike all this awful Node/React stuff. They have no idea how professional ActionScript programmers did things.
I think the "one big file" is a part people neglect to mention, it means you can just copy that to ftp and the site is deployed.
Modern Web tech takes a lot of experience before you can even deploy a site.