So if 57% in a country agree with a law, the remaining 43% should be allowed to circumvent that law through these means?
Of course, the opposite argument is "what about north korea", but it's a package deal is my point.
Of course, the opposite argument is "what about north korea", but it's a package deal is my point.
If almost half of the population disagree with something then it’s probably a stupid restriction to begin with.
Basically, generally, live and let live.
There is a difference between not being interested or disliking something, and wanting it to literally be illegal.