It is easy to manufacture contradictions by prooftexting. It isn't difficult to read in a favored hypothesis that contains contradictions, but that is by no means demanded by the text. Many can be resolved by recognizing that the same thing was being described from two different perspectives or with a focus on different aspects.

The quintessential example is perhaps #3 which purports that the two accounts of creation are contradictory. But there are a number of ways to interpret Genesis [0] that doesn't result in contradiction while maintaining the theological truths that are the purpose of biblical texts. The Bible isn't a scientific treatise.

Another typical class of examples are the purported inconsistencies within the Gospels themselves [1].

An article on inerrancy you might find interesting [2].

[0] https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/are-there-co...

[1] https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/how-to-reso...

[2] https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/is-scripture...