> Because I provided evidence?

No, you provided an anecdote. And then you interpreted a lot into very little.

> I don't see how laying out logically like this makes me the "Reddit Expert", sort of the opposite.

Selling anecdotes as evidence and flimsy interpretations as facts, and making unfounded statements like

> The only 2 things in the universe that know that 6 is the maximum white flag emojis for jokes, and then might be modified by plus signs is ...

> My brain, and that digital instance of Claude AI

is exactly my definition of a Reddit Expert.