Hacker News Reader

> What the paper actually proposes [...]

(Emphasis mine)

I haven't read the paper yet, but this sounds like a (good) summary of exactly what the article is saying. It makes me wonder what, if anything, you feel is different from the way you put it and the way it is explained in the article? As a layman they seem the same to me.

View on HN

The article was written by the main author of the paper, so yes, it's a good summary :)

I meant that the parent comment to mine was a good summary of the article.

However, the comment was worded as if it meant to highlight some difference between how the article summarized the paper and what the paper is actually saying. Since I couldn't see a difference between the above poster's summary and that in the article, I was curious what I was missing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com