> It raises awareness of the issue.
OK, I'll bite. Who is now aware of the issue who wasn't previously?
OK, I'll bite. Who is now aware of the issue who wasn't previously?
The majority of HN readers and GH users would immediately close issues / pull requests like this and be bitter about it. I don't understand why there is a double standard being applied here.
We should also note that making this software open (which is actually pretty badly designed, actually looking at it) is a similar farce. The objective they claim, for doing so, is somehow related to an open government. That's like claiming open-sourcing the software you use to send electronic messages back and forth is making your actual communications with said software "open." Nonsense.