Was this article written by AI? If I argue with it, am I arguing with a real person? Is it written by a corporate shill? Again, if I argue with it, am I talking to a wall?

AI (and before that, corporations) makes skepticism more and more a basic survival skill.

Since this is partly an experience report, it is only as trustworthy as its author, whoever that is. What is this person risking by writing it?

The content seems plausible to me. However, what I’m missing here is:

- how does he test?

- how does he keep himself sharp while his tools are doing so much?

- How does he model the failure modes of this approach, or does he just feel it?

I am not having the same feeling of success as this guy is as I experiment with the same tech. Maybe he’s better than me at using it. Or maybe he’s easily impressed.