Hacker News Reader

Comment by ryao | Hacker News Reader

The website says “$8.50/month” and “$99 billed annually” for Pro Annual. Those numbers are inconsistent. $99 annually is $8.25/month. Usually, one would expect a wealth management service to be able to divide 99 by 12 correctly. Failing to do this is not very encouraging.

View on HN

Monthly doesn't make sense either. Is it monthly or is it quarterly? $10/month > $29 quarterly.

Whether it's legit or not, it's seeming like a lot of Show HN posts that make the front page are giving vibes of "Ah, another AI generated tailwind/Stripe template that collects emails and was slapped together in an hour". They have SEC registration but don't have literally any information on their about us for a company I'd need to be able to trust

Very fair comments, platform was not slapped together with AI. Landing redesign, was. We're in the process of putting a more robust about us page now with more details about us and the company.

I don't see anything inherently wrong with that, but it's worth appreciating that while LLMs can handle some of the time-consuming template work, it still takes a lot of time and attention to detail to make a website, especially as the intake for your business. If you want to establish a real relationship with someone who's attractive and makes good lifestyle choices, it needs to be clear that you're matching that energy; renting a suit for the first date isn't going to go far in the eyes of a fitness enthusiast if you haven't been brushing your teeth for years or just started hitting the gym after new years. The corollary is that if you have been taking solid care of yourself and are otherwise attractive, you might as well get a professional haircut buy some decent clothes.

Very apt metaphor you got here. I feel like I let you down.

It read to me as a (very) small discount for choosing to be billed annually vs. monthly.

Yeah, it's a $20 discount billed annually.

Then that would be $100 per year and none of your numbers for annual plans are accurate. Your website claims $99 per year and claims that is equivalent to $8.50 per month. None of these 3 numbers are equivalent.

You're correct! I made the fix.

The discount is applied to $10/month and is said to make it effectively $8.5 per month, but is actually $8.25 per month, since they claim to charge $99 per year.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com