But these stories are still reaching the front page, so arguably the flaggers are up against the algorithm and the algorithm is winning.
This article is about "testing" conducted by a guy who is trying to sell competing software products and has produced videos in the past that weren't replicable and were likely staged. They never release unedited footage or car diagnostic data, just a produced video presented with the intent of damaging Tesla's reputation and boosting their own sales.
This happens all the time, from the New York Times' false claims that their review car ran out of charge, to the most recent Mark Rober video that cost the CEO of a lidar company his job.
The video in this article requires independent validation it is not from a trusted source as it is produced by an extremely biased and financially motivated Tesla competitor.
What competing software products?
The founder went as far as to run for CA senator just to regulate Tesla and bought a Superbowl ad to smear the company. https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/12/dawn-project-tesla-ad-fsd-...
Somehow operating systems and software development tools are in direct competition with Tesla ADAS software. Turns out Tesla is not in competition with GM, it is actually in competition with Linux, GCC, and Windows. Amazing.
The smear campaign to silence whistleblowers is still going strong.