Hacker News Reader

Full thread

RcouF1uZ4gsC

This drivel is worse than ChatGPT.

There is no deep insight.

It is highly formulaic and mechanical:

1. Find a controversy

2. Invent a trend

3. Get quotes from some people who agree with you

4. Mention “ethics” all at a very superficial level.

5. Publish

You would be much better served by having a 15 minute conversation with ChatGPT about this topic than reading this article.

View on HN

i think there is a fundamental rather simple insight you should probably grasp, instead of shooting the messenger:

the humans, writ large, do not want this LLM revolution. a handful of well connected folks overruling this and ramming AI everything down everyone's throats will not alter this sentiment to become acceptance instead.

polling is consistent with the articles simple conclusion, so your claim of manufactured outrage rings hollow.

It’s Wired, so there.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com