What if there truly is no moat?
What if you can just hook your AI system up to some other AI system and drain everything? No weights access required. Just train on the raw inputs/outputs.
What stops this from being the future?
What if you can just hook your AI system up to some other AI system and drain everything? No weights access required. Just train on the raw inputs/outputs.
What stops this from being the future?
I've had Claude 3.5, Grok 3, and DeepSeek claim that it was made by OpenAI.
I wonder does OpenAI has permission from all authors of works it "inappropriately distilled"? A pirate has no right to complain about safety of navigation.
I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B.
The rulings are leaning towards it being transformative enough to be fair use, so permission may not be required [1]. We'll have to see how it goes with Disney vs Midjourney.
> I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B.
This would be pointless with China, since it's already how they operate, as continuously reported by the WTO.
But, I see your point.
[1] https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-distr...
It never ends. There's no moat. One day your at-home GPU will unwind an entire hyperscaler's worth of expertise.
Does the capital outlay get them anything at all apart from a temporary lead?
While you couldn't download a car, your product use might train a low-cost competitor.