> I don't actually believe it's true, I think it's pure hype and LLMs won't even approximate AGI.
Not sure how you can say this so confidently. Many would argue they're already pretty close, at least on a short time horizon.
Not sure how you can say this so confidently. Many would argue they're already pretty close, at least on a short time horizon.
There is a decade + worth of implementation details and new techniques to invent before we have something functionally equivalent to Jarvis.