If you were Taiwanese this would worry you?
It makes complete sense for Taiwan to invest in maintaining it’s “silicon shield” even as china tries to catch up with fabrication on the mainland.
NATO doesn't consider Ukraine as significant because they have vital tech they supply globally. Rather, NATO is concerned about an aggressive regional power that may have aims on more than just Ukraine.
I don't mean to defend the Soviet regime here but in the interest of discussion: the "to subjugate them" aspect is still somewhat contested [0]. I'm not sure whether it would even class as genocide according to the UN's own criteria.
From my understanding: the famine was definitely man-made, the question is more about whether it was intentional.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor_genocide_question
they wont. full stop. they've even admitted as much in industry. they'll be extremely happy if they're (only!) a few years behind tsmc
at this point, what will be a real earthshaker is if china manages to get past 7nm. smic has gotten a long way but even that company's 7nm process has serious limitations (much higher cost and worse yields)
and anyways, aside from a handful of use cases (ai being one tbh), 7nm chips are more than viable for any general purpose task. a "leapfrog" is quickly diminishing from a "need" to a "want", and the resulting governmental support is fading as well. of course, it'll still be a high priority for the chinese, but it's not like top of the list.
You could buy phones with SMIC 7nm chips as early as mid 2024, that means yields were good enough around mid 2023.
This indicates they'd be on track to do 5nm this year, which is what the news articles indicate. The impressive part is that this is catching up with ASML+TSMC combined. There's no other company or government in the world that has achieved this vertical in the last few decades. China is willing to sink Manhattan project level resources into this, for good reason.
The Chinese perspective itself certainly isn't anything close to these vague abstractions, outside of vague anti-western polemics or nationalist chest-beating. After all with the same logic we're pouring a "manhattan's worth of funding" into "AI", dosen't mean we're going to be reaching Gen-AI anytime soon!
> Everything, even very advanced technology, can be reverse engineered, especially if you already know conceptually what it does
This isn't true. Maybe for software it is. Manufacturing is one of the hardest stages, and China lacks tooling for the ultra-high precision engineering required to actually implement this process.
It's kind of like building a nuclear bomb - conceptually it's easy. Hell, the first nuke was dropped before the microwave oven was commercially available.
The real challenge is manufacturing the damn thing. Refining all of that uranium is not an easy task - even today.
China has spent billions of USD equivalent trying to copy EUV. They have had access to EUV installations and fully disassembled them (funny story: they broke it putting it back together).
They are highly motivated, they have a ton of money, and frankly, they're no a bunch of dummies.
And yet, they still don't have it. (fwiw i think they will by the end of 2030)
I disagree. We already have, by anyone's standards from 2021.
We keep shifting the bar, somewhat intentionally so that progress doesn't stall.
I guess my mistake was assuming they would ship it considering how rough it is financially, but they probably will for bragging rights.
> You could buy phones with SMIC 7nm chips as early as mid 2024, that means yields were good enough around mid 2023.
That was a halo product
> The impressive part is that this is catching up with ASML+TSMC combined.
Without euv, they are mining diminishing returns.
> There's no other company or government in the world that has achieved this vertical in the last few decades.
No, they had the advantage of copying and learning from decades of industry experience.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s impressive, but expecting Chinese leadership in this space by 2030 is foolish.
Of course, I’m never going to rule out anyone’s long term success, but there is no indication they’re in any position of leadership.
My rough best guess is that they’ll be shipping euv-involved chips by 2028. That’s not a leapfrog, that’s parity
Not sure why you are basing your whole argument on euv. There's nothing magical about it that prevents them from stealing/reinventing it.
I'm not. We were talking about "leapfrogging" and that naturally requires a technology that enables processes beyond EUV's capabilities.
In fact, many hours before you responded to my post, I responded to my own post with this: "My rough best guess is that they’ll be shipping euv-involved chips by 2028."
> There's nothing magical about it that prevents them from stealing/reinventing it.
If it was so easy they'd have done it already.
No, it's just insanely complicated to implement and the innovations required are not just the conceptual technology itself, but the high precision manufacturing prowess required to actually execute it.
And again, I think they're probably gonna have it before 2030. Hell, I could be convinced that they're going to start taping out EUV-based chips by the end of next year, although I would require a beer wager for that :)
But we were talking about leapfrogging, and that's "only" parity.
China can comfortably make chips that might be the equivalent of 5 year old Taiwanese ones. Last time I checked, that’s extremely viable.
No military general ever is going to say, “we can’t invade, we’re half a decade behind!”
Nothing screams “favorable market conditions” like WW3 and sanctions rivaling Russia.
But it would be incredibly stupid strategically.
I think only sensible path is to give Taiwan nuclear weapons. It removes all the dangers for ever.
End result requires more energy, has lower yield and is overall more expensive.
For military purposes and whatnot that's enough, but they can't put this in consumer devices without subsidies.
It is still hard to get much of a clear picture on how well they are doing on this stuff. Chinese companies are saying they are near parity, the opposition says they are 15 years behind, the reality is probably somewhere in between.
While they have made a lot of quick progress, that is no guarantee for future gains.
On the flipside Canon's Nanoimprint Lithography promises lower cost, even if their feature size is 15nm in practice. They also appear to be having competition now:
https://www.zyvexlabs.com/apm/atomically-precise-nano-imprin...
Recently Canon shipped the first commercial device and it appears that this path will see continued development. 15nm(14 advertised) is already good enough for, say, automotive applications.