I've consumed large amounts of erythritol for probably 10+ years. What should I watch for? Blood pressure?
* It does not show human harm, only cellular disruption.
* It uses an unnatural exposure method.
* It builds on epidemiological correlations that may be reverse causality.
* It does not account for systemic factors, metabolism, or adaptive responses.
As you say I believe the correlation is reverse causality. It's much more likely that people who consume stuff with "artificial" sweetener are already at risk for stroke than the other way around.
If you don't have weight/cardio problems it is weird to consume "sugar-free" stuff and associated because they are almost always worse tasting than the real deal.
To have any importance they would need a big population sample and correct for already existing risks for stroke and I believe they would find that this stuff has very little impact, if any.
But as always, it doesn't cost much to limit consumption, so why not?
Lots of things kill cancer cells in petri dishes that have proven to be useless as medicines.
And your repeated ad hominim "rando on the internet" is counter to good dialectic.
Unlike with treating cancer, there is no meaningful reward here. As I noted, the risk-reward favors not taking it.
The possible truth is less important here than the possible consequence.
I think you should talk to some doctors about this; I've never heard of anything like this before, and I know that when odd vision/eye-stuff is concerned, it can sometimes warrant a visit to a neurologist.
- They ask a series of questions trying to determine if the issues are a risk to myself or others.
- If it's serious enough they may do a series of the wrong scans.
- They prescribe me some drugs and send me on my way.
Even if by some bizarre chance I had real neurologists and lets say they find something, then what? Statistically my chances of mortality go up the moment I enter the OR and that is even before they attempt to fix something. If the issue is not getting worse I prefer to accept the risk rather than compounding it by letting people confidently act like they know what they are doing. Now if some day it starts getting worse and especially if it gets in the way of normal daily life then I might consider it but even then I would likely leave the country to get better treatment and reduced risk of mortality. In the mean time I keep an eye on the sub-set of people with the same condition the numbers appear to be growing and see how it plays out for them. As of now I suspect it will play out like tinnitus; in that, it will be loosely studied but nobody will know what to do with it or ever fully understand it.
I know that I sound jaded. I am. That train has left the station. I've been abused by the medical business far too long. In my unwavering opinion the entire thing needs to be completely wiped and re-created by entirely different people but that is a 42 volume set of books for another day.
Evidence in vitro suggests enhanced platelet activity. Plasma levels of erythritol are sustained for >2d above thresholds associated with platelet hyper-reactivity after consumption of realistic doses.
I use artificial sweeteners, but prefer sucralose or anything else to erythritol. I actually don't understand why people still use it (often in 'health food' because it's seen as 'natural'), there are much safer options.