You agree that your statement that it runs firefox extensions is misleading, right?
If I said “linux runs windows software and games” without further remarks, people would be correct to call me out on it.
If I said “linux runs windows software and games” without further remarks, people would be correct to call me out on it.
Are there really people who read that and think “ALL Windows software and games” is implied? Bizarre to me.
Your biases are leaning in different directions.
Running Windows software on Linux requires a bit of domain knowledge; e.g. Wine, Lutris, Proton. E.g. which software actually works really well, which software works with tweaks, and which software largely works but you need to avoid certain features. The fact that you need to install special software, and it isn't some core OS compatibility layer like 32-bit support makes it lean towards "runs Windows software and games" being a little ambitious. It's not a perfect user story, that's all.
0.0001% of users will use this. It's a non-starter.
The only solution to this problem is antitrust enforcement against Google.