Comment by dangus | Hacker News Reader

Comment by dangus | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Nobody likes to hear it but hardware just doesn’t last that long.

Even if you reuse the hardware by selling it off to homelab types or donating it, it’ll get faulty in a few very short years. It’s already been running 24/7 for a long time.

It’ll also be far less energy efficient in operation compared to newer hardware generations.

I also don’t really see what your beef with SO is for using SQL Server. Are you suggesting that companies do a major refactor every time their software stack goes out of style? There really isn’t anything wrong with SQL Server nor is there anything wrong with SO at a technical level.

You might be upset that entire industries run on imperfect tech stacks but value isn’t driven by tech stack choice. I’m not going to buy a sandwich from a different restaurant because they are using better tech than the restaurant with bad food.

> Nobody likes to hear it but hardware just doesn’t last that long.

My experience completely contradicts this, both at work and otherwise. The typical longevity of servers has always astounded me. Though my current biggish server (not including routers, etc) is a Zen 1 on 14nm built pre-pandemic; I've read 12nm and smaller might be more susceptible to degradation. RAM feature size has remained fairly constant, but I wouldn't be surprised if SSD MLC longevity has degraded.

The real issue, IMO, is that when you have a small set of servers any hardware issues become a bigger hassle. It's precisely because you can go years with a rack of servers humming along that when there is an issue, it feels quite intrusive and annoying.

Using a 6-7 year old system as an example of impressive longevity isn’t particularly convincing. You’re at the back end of their useful lifespan just like I mentioned.

>Nobody likes to hear it but hardware just doesn’t last that long.

Authorized corporate resellers beg to differ.

>It’ll also be far less energy efficient in operation compared to newer hardware generations.

I'd love spending thousands of dollars for new server racks for my homelab just because every other company decided to destroy their server racks instead of reselling them when they eventually upgrade their datacenter.

>》food analogy《

Imagine being so fat you look at computers and see food.

How long it lasts is irrelevant. I didn’t cite lifespan, I cited their present market value.

$50k is $50k.

Is that the present market value after deducting the time it takes to prepare, store, and ship them for sale?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com