For the medical world, I’d look to the Invisalign example as a more realistic path on how automation will become part of it.
The human will still be there the scale of operations per doctor will go up and prices will go down.
For the medical world, I’d look to the Invisalign example as a more realistic path on how automation will become part of it.
The human will still be there the scale of operations per doctor will go up and prices will go down.
And I think it’s another great example of how automation is happening in the medical practice.
(Serious remark)
Neither me nor my friends (all of us who got lasik) asked for it, but my clinic gave me valium, and my friends’ clinic gave them xanax shortly before the procedure.
Tangential sidenote: that was nearly 8 years ago, and I am absolutely glad I got it done.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/18/lasik-laser-...
I think it's interesting that we as human think it's better to create some (somewhat mostly) correct roboter to perform medical stuff instead of - together as human race - start to care about stuff.
It’s a much better investment of time to make robots that can do delicate activities (eg Neuralink’s implant robot), consistently and correctly, than training humans and praying that all of them are equally skilled, never get older or drink coffee or come to the operating table stressed out one day…
I just say that the path to that and the way it’s going to be implemented is going to be different and Invisalign is a better example to how it will happen in the medical industry compared to automotive.