I don’t love either party’s behavior here, but there’s no need to mislead like this.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/20/world/middleeast/israel-h...
I don’t love either party’s behavior here, but there’s no need to mislead like this.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/20/world/middleeast/israel-h...
I still maintain that Netanyahu would gladly sacrifice hostages to keep the war hot. And that NYT article is a fascinating artifact in highlighting Israeli feelings of anguish while Palestinians are killed en masse.
If people hadn't started accusing Israel (and Biden, somehow) of genocide basically on October 8, perhaps there'd be less debate right now. It's really frustrating to both feel that Israel can do no right (the pager attack, while obviously viscerally terrifying, had objectively incredible combatant/innocent ratios compared to literally any other way of prosecuting war, and it's the height of hypocrisy for people claiming that Israel should simply special forces snipe every Hamas fighter individually to criticize it) and at the same time fully agree that Netanyahu and the settlers are shithead monster assholes and that civilian casualties are now inexcusable, beyond a reasonable doubt.
People started accusing Israel, and its American sponsors, of genocide long before October 8; that Israel is engaged in s campaign of genocide against the Palestinian people has been the dominant position in pro-Palestinian activist circles for decades.
People started paying attention more after October 7, 2023, but that's not when the accusations began.
So did the genocide itself, which has always been constrained by what Israel thinks they can get away with based on political conditions (mainly in the US, whose active military support, financial aid, and UNSC veto they want to maintain) and the available pretext’s they can hid atrocities behind.
There is a relationship.
Do you understand? I'm not, and at no point have I been, discussing or debating facts on the ground in Gaza. I'm making an effort to assume good faith. I am telling you about the experience of people that are "gettable" for your movement, people that largely agree that what's happening is abhorrent, but that are feeling alienated by the dogmatism, and you're telling me why dogmatism is correct. Iinot talking about what's correct, I'm talking about what's successfully persuasive.
No, Israel & the US wanted a continuation via a modified version of phase 1 ceasefire rather than proceed to phase 2: securing exchange of Israeli captives but with the temporary cessation of military activities i.e., allowing them to resume.
Phase 2 as originally outlined & agreed would have been a commitment to a permanent cessation of military and hostile activities, withdrawal, and exchange of the remaining surviving Israeli & number of Palestinian captives[2]:
Announce restoration of a sustainable calm (cessation of military operations and hostilities permanently) and its commencement prior to the exchange of hostages and prisoners between the two sides – all remaining Israeli hostages who are living men (civilians and soldiers) in exchange for a number of prisoners in Israeli prisons and detention centers and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza strip.
Moreover, Israel was supposed to send negotiators for implementation of phase 2 no later than the 16th day of phase 1(February 3rd) per the phase 1 agreement. Instead, Netanyahu met up with Trump, formulated their own agreement without any other mediators, and they delayed sending in negotiators until 2 days(February 27th) before phase 1 of the ceasefire was set to end with a "take it or else" approach.
[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/24/middleeast/gaza-israel-de... [2] https://archive.is/c82OT