Hacker News Reader

> we're quickly approaching a time where we'll have to take EVERY study skeptically until it can be replicated

I've always felt like this should be the norm. Why would you trust something before it can be replicated? Even if it's unintentional, people make mistakes.

View on HN

> I've always felt like this should be the norm. Why would you trust something before it can be replicated? Even if it's unintentional, people make mistakes.

If you are close enough with a scientist, generally they will admit they don’t trust a single study

Some fields also have guardrails, such as the LIGO being two separate detectors a with two independent teams

Individually, yes I've been there a LONG time.

Unfortunately, we have a media and political structure that uses the most recent study/model/whatever to advocate for, design, and enact policy before that review.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com