> but there's nothing authoritarian about that.
Keeping authoritarian promises is authoritarian. Believing otherwise is interesting.
Keeping authoritarian promises is authoritarian. Believing otherwise is interesting.
Otherwise, a conversation can not be had.
It's interesting you view that he ran on authoritarian ideals, yet still won the popular vote.
Yes while populist leaders can be authoritarian, it does not mean this one is. I'm still waiting for someone to name a specific policy so a discussion debating whether it is authoritarian or not can begin.
It is however, interesting that you believe a candidate ran on and won the popular vote as the leader of the free world on authoritarian ideals. Do you think that little of American voters? Or are you misinformed / biased?
/s obviously. Does anyone else remember PPP? And the last 10 years of accelerationist wet dreams come true?
It’s distressing that apparently half of the country welcomes or at least doesn’t mind authoritarianism, but it doesn’t somehow disprove it.