Hacker News Reader

The comparisons do make you wonder if they fiddled with the lighting artificially though, some of the differences are surprisingly drastic.

View on HN

I doubt it. The camera seems to have HDRI. That, a looong exposure time, and a tripod can do amazing things.

Plus, it's compared to a photo they took with "a competitor's phone". Even I can take an amazingly crap photo with my camera-phone, it's not hard.

Ah, yeah I guess HDR would do it, slanted comparison nonetheless.

I was actually wondering about this, maybe you can enlighten us. Could they not have used external ligthing for the Nokia shot, and none for the competitor shot? How do we know they used the same lighting conditions?

Not trying to feed the anti-Nokia, I've always been curious of these types of things.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com