"To be clear: as far as we know, AI doesn't cause psychosis. It UNMASKS it using whatever story your brain already knows."
Guess which part of the thread gets the headline. Also, this directly contradicts the opening line where he says "...losing touch with reality because of AI".
Which is it? I REALLY can't wait till commentariats move past AI.
He addresses that in the next post:
> AI was the trigger, but not the gun.
One way of teasing that apart is to consider that AI didn't cause the underlying psychosis, but AI made it worse, so that AI caused the hospitalisation.
Or AI didn't cause the loose grip on reality, but it exacerbated that into completely losing touch with reality.
If it wasn't AI that triggered it, it would've been something else, somewhere.
His other posts are click baity and not what one would consider serious science journalism.
The OP is pgy4:
> In this capacity, the PGY-4 will lead treatment team, provide guidance to younger residents, teach medical students, and make final medical decision for patients. There will always be an attending physician available for advice and recommendations, but this experience allows the PGY-4 to fully utilize the training, knowledge, and leadership skills that have been cultivated throughout residency.
https://www.med.unc.edu/psych/education/residency/program-cu...
Trying to convince someone not to do something, when they can pull a 100 counter-examples out of thin air of why they should, is legitimately worrying.