I doubt. Whether what he did was right or not, it needed a lot of careful planning — not something everyone could do. The CEOs are safe.
Flight tracking data is public.
What's shocking isn't that the Luigi case happened; what's shocking is that it doesn't happen more frequently.
I think just about literally anyone can go up to someone on the street, shoot them while they're defenseless and then get caught within 5 days.
Also, I can help you on your moral waffling: what he did was fundamentally wrong.
Public figures don't have personal security because it's _hard_ to find them. They have personal security because it's _easy_ to find them.
It depends on how you read the situation, if it's a slow brewing revolution it'll be deemed morally right after the facts
Do you export all of your moral reasoning to whatever the popular opinion is?
I would be surprised because it didn’t happen [1].
[1] https://www.blackstone.com/people/stephen-a-schwarzman-2/
"LePatner, who served as CEO of the Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust (BREIT), was killed in a shooting Monday at the company’s headquarters, Blackstone said in a statement."
[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2025/07/29/blackston...
Right. Same as the Luigi guy. She was "CEO" of a department. Not the CEO of Blackstone. Relative to the actually rich she's upper middle class.
That’s not a CEO. It’s a performative title. The point is the people this article concerns itself with, CEOs of top companies, actual CEOs, they’re not the ones getting shot. Their direct reports, or in the case of Blackstone, I believe, their reports’ reports, are the ones taking the bullets.