> 4) There is no answer for spent fuel.
We store it. There are radioactive waste storage sites in 39 US states, for example.
https://curie.pnnl.gov/system/files/SNF%20and%20Rep%20Waste%...
We store it. There are radioactive waste storage sites in 39 US states, for example.
https://curie.pnnl.gov/system/files/SNF%20and%20Rep%20Waste%...
And if humanity can’t do anything that it hasn’t done before, why should we care about power generation or any problem that wasn’t completely solved before today? (Like today. The day that you are reading this.)
Why are you so irrationally anti-nuclear?
Also, France has a state-owned company operating the plants. I would not be averse to an American version of that, or perhaps just expand and enhance the training they already do for the naval nuclear power program and send navy nukes to operate them. I don't trust American corporations to operate them properly.
“Nuclear waste makes me nervous” is not proof that we have dug up everything that has ever been buried.
Given the (possibly intentional?) inability to parse language here, to make sure that you’re not a bot, is it possible for you to answer the question? If yes say yes and then answer it, if no just write something vaguely anti-nuclear
Also, this line of inquiry is still just tilting at windmills; "somehow, future Fred Flintstone manages to get a hold of equipment capable of digging out a mile of concrete and yet somehow not know what radiation is" is not a productive line of thinking at best and a bad-faith argument at worst.
Humanity's mechanical capacity to dig that deep actually post-dates its discovery of radioactivity, too. If they have the technology for it for them digging it up to become an issue, they'll be able to identify, trivially, that it is an issue.