Hacker News Reader

So basically the product is "Custom IaC with AI agent" Sounds like a great business model if you can convince companies to go for it.

However, as SRE, pass. I'd rather keep IaC in one of our pre existing tools which much wider support and less lock in. Also, since I'm in Azure/GCP, this tool won't work for me anyways since it's AWS focused and when you go multi cloud, the difficulty ramps up pretty quickly.

View on HN

Essentially. I'm not sure you could call it IAC specifically, but the same ideas apply.

Regarding lock in: I don't necessarily think there is anything here that is stopping you from writing TF and importing objects. Conversely, SI is great for importing resources into their model.

So the objects are essentially modeled in type script on the back end so support for other vendors is available. It's just whether or not they are created yet. I'll let the SI folks dive into details there.

It's absolutely AWS focused today - but one upside of the approach is that building the models is straightforward, because we can build a pipeline that goes from the upstream's specification, augments it with documentation and validation, etc. We'll certainly be expanding coverage.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com