Hacker News Reader

Comment by lukev | Hacker News Reader

Should any administration be investigating a private entity for bias?

Whether there is bias or not is entirely immaterial! The government should not be the Ministry of Truth!

I can think of a few instances where a government should investigate private entities for unlawful bias, such as biased non-merit based hiring, or biased interest rates based on the ethical background (e.g. via zip code) of the lender, or refusal to render service to people of colour.

Yes. Because there are laws against those things.

There are no laws about bias in political content published by private entities. Because of the Constitution.

It's amazing how many discussions on HN are about "Company A is bad" instead of: "This behavior by the government is completely illegal or unethical and should not be occurring in a free society."

And as the very first comment points out, whether there is truth in the charge or not, now there are people saying "A is bad because I read it on the interwebs!" And regardless of where the investigation goes, there will be more comments talking about the good/bad of Wikipedia, and not the good/bad of the US government (or other governments as the case may be.) This is about the 10th post in the past week that suffers from this phonomenon (see the US buying part of Intel posts for an excellent example.)

HN commenters are very very good at missing the forest for the trees. Sometimes I wonder if it's intentional. Unfortunately, I think it often isn't.

Is a non-profit a private entity ?

Yes. Although the privileged tax status of a 501(c)(3) does come with the restriction that they cannot engage in direct political campaigning or endorsement of candidates, they are still a private entity fully protected by the first amendment.

In this context, yes. It gets confusing, but a "public entity" refers to the government.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com