Oh I have no doubt those lines are becoming more and more blurred and that certain big companies in key positions are theoretically beyond accountability.

But the question was "why trust a company and not the government?"

So even now it's between:

  * A company who, if big enough and in a key position, could theoretically do this

And

  * A government who we know for sure have grabbed multiple people off the streets, within the past month, and have trafficked them out of the country without any due process. 

So it's still "could maybe do harm" versus "already controls an army of masked men who are undeniably active in doing harm."