I think we should make policy based on real events instead of imaginary ones. If people in the administration say something is happening, then it's up to them to provide evidence of it. Otherwise it seems safer to assume they are lying.
The ambush was a real event!!! A man was shot in the neck and nearly killed. WTF??? So does an ICE agent need to actually be murdered in cold blood for you to care about their safety?
That's a strawman argument and doesn't really engage curious discussion. GP never said that agents need to be murdered in cold blood, nor did they say that they didn't care about the agents' safety.
ICE agents willingly assume roles that involve inflicting harm on others. Given that, I cannot view their personal safety as a priority compared to the safety of those whose families and lives they disrupt.